Legal Opinion

In re Lolio

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 21, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Effective March 6, 2000, this Court reciprocally suspended respondent for a period of three months (272 AD2d 678). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and has submitted the required satisfactory proof of his reinstatement to practice in New Jersey. Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, does not oppose the application. Accordingly, the application is granted and respondent is reinstated to the practice of law, effective…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re ChulakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re ChulakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re LolioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API