In re Lolio
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 1986. That same year he was also admitted in New Jersey and practiced with a law firm in that jurisdiction.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey suspended respondent from practice for a period of three months, effective March 6, 2000. From about 1992 through 1995, 219 wills prepared by respondent were signed by the testators in his presence but the witnesses signed outside the presence of the testators, relying upon respondent’s assurances that he had seen the testators sign the wills. The wills were therefore not executed in strict *679conformity…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re ChulakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re LolioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000