Legal Opinion

In re Chulak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1998PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Per Curiam.

Effective March 24, 1998, this Court reciprocally suspended respondent for a period of three months (Matter of Chulak, 251 AD2d 744). He now applies for reinstatement.

Our examination of the papers submitted on this application indicates that respondent has substantially complied with the provisions of the order of suspension and with section 806.9 of this Court’s rules (22 NYCRR 806.9) regarding the conduct of suspended attorneys and with the provisions of the order of suspension regarding reinstatement. Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, has not submitted papers…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re ChulakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re LolioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API