Legal Opinion
United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 26, 1997No. Crim. Action 91-0655 (JHG)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In re Fourth Round Petitions of the Bank of New York and the Bank of California International
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are the United States’ motions to dismiss the Fourth Round Petitions of the Bank of New York (“BNY’s L-Claim”) and the Bank of California International (“BOCI’s L-Claim”), which were filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1963®. For the reasons stated below, the motions to dismiss will be granted, and the L-Claims will be dismissed.
Background
The facts surrounding BCCI’s collapse are well known in the financial and legal…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- United States v. ReckmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Lawrence W. Lavin Wmot Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), S.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Zeal Global Services Private Limited v. Suntrust BankDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2020