Legal Opinion
Corrigan v. Barbery
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided May 3, 2005No. 01-CV-6148PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
BIANCHINI, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Kevin Corrigan (“Corrigan”) filed this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the parties have consented to disposition of this matter by the undersigned. Corrigan seeks to overturn his conviction solely on the basis that the reasonable doubt charge given at his trial was unconstitutional.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Corrigan was tried before a jury in Niagara County Court (Hannigan, J.) in September 1979 on charges stemming from two…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lindh v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Victor v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Cage v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hardy v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Adkins v. WardenDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2008
- Rosati v. KernanDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Rivera v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- (HC) Rosiles v. PfeifferDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.