Legal Opinion

Marino v. Ragen

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 12, 1948No. 93PublishedCited by 150 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner sought a writ of habeas corpus in the Circuit Court of Winnebago County, Illinois, alleging that his conviction in 1925 on a charge of murder was the result of a denial of his rights under the Federal Constitution. That court, after a hearing, quashed the writ; and as its order cannot be reviewed by any higher Illinois court under Illinois practice, this petition for a writ of certiorari is properly addressed to this Court. See Woods v. *562Nierstheimer, 328 U. S. 211; 15 U. of Chic. L. Rev. 118, 122.

The facts conceded by respondent are as follows:

The common-law record recites that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bozza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Woods v. NierstheimerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Baltzer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

3Cited by150 opinions

  1. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court of KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Darr v. BurfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

145 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API