Legal Opinion

Coyle v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1988No. 2910PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAMILIA, Judge:

This is an appeal from the Order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Rubin & Margolis, individually, and trading as Bonnet Lane Pharmacy. 1 There are two issues which we must consider: 1) whether our decision in Makripodis v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 361 Pa.Super, 589, 523 A.2d 374 (1987) is applicable to the instant case; and 2) whether a denial of a motion for judgment on the pleadings forever precludes a party from receiving a subsequent grant of summary judgment.

Appellants brought this suit claiming their son, William, was born with badly deformed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Makripodis v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Harvey v. HansenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Sidkoff, Pincus, Greenberg & Green, P.C. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Coyle v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Blum v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. White v. WeinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Blum v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Shemory v. Keystone InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API