Coyle v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
TAMILIA, Judge:
This is an appeal from the Order granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Rubin & Margolis, individually, and trading as Bonnet Lane Pharmacy. 1 There are two issues which we must consider: 1) whether our decision in Makripodis v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 361 Pa.Super, 589, 523 A.2d 374 (1987) is applicable to the instant case; and 2) whether a denial of a motion for judgment on the pleadings forever precludes a party from receiving a subsequent grant of summary judgment.
Appellants brought this suit claiming their son, William, was born with badly deformed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Makripodis v. Merrell-Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Harvey v. HansenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Sidkoff, Pincus, Greenberg & Green, P.C. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coyle v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Blum v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- White v. WeinerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Blum v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Shemory v. Keystone InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.