Legal Opinion

Sidkoff, Pincus, Greenberg & Green, P.C. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 17, 1987No. 2604PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

This appeal is taken by plaintiff-Appellant, a law firm which had entered into a contract of fire insurance with defendant-Appellee, an insurance company, from an order of the trial court denying a motion for summary judgment *37by Appellant, and finding Appellee not liable. Three appeals have been filed in this matter and have been consolidated. The appeal at No. 2604 PHL 1986 and the appeal at No. 1364 PHL 1987 are from the the trial court’s order of September 11, 1986, denying Appellant’s petition for reconsideration. A denial of reconsideration is not subject to review on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Provident National Bank v. RooklinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. United States National Bank v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Burkhart v. Brockway Glass Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Progressive Home Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. KocakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sidkoff, Pincus, Greenberg & Green, P.C. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Coyle v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API