Legal Opinion

Coyle v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 1991PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

William and Marie Coyle brought this action against Richardson-Merrell, Inc., (now Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) (“Merrell Dow”) and David Rubin and Seymour Margolis, pharmacists trading as Bonnet Lane Pharmacy (“Bonnet Lane”), alleging that Bendectin, a prescription drug manufactured by Merrell Dow and supplied to Marie Coyle by Bonnet Lane, caused their son to be born with malformed limbs. Common Pleas Court granted Bonnet Lane’s motion for summary judgment and Superior Court affirmed. 372 Pa.Super. 118, 538 A.2d 1379. We granted allocatur to address the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Musser v. Vilsmeier Auction Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Francioni v. Gibsonia Truck Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Tincher, T. v. Omega Flex, Inc., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Cottam v. CVS PharmacyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  3. Lance v. WyethSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. Hahn v. RichterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Memorial Hosp. of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 2002

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API