Blum v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
*99 OPINION
NIX, Chief Justice.
Appellants, Jeffrey Blum, a minor, by his parents and natural guardians, Joan and Fred Blum, and Joan and Fred Blum in their own right, appeal from an Order of the Superior Court affirming in part and reversing in part the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County granting a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (“judgment n.o.v.”), in favor of Rite-Aid Pharmacy (“Rite-Aid”), and denying a motion for judgment n.o.v. and/or new trial filed by Appellee, Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., (“Merrell Dow”). The issue before this Court is whether…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Thompson v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Kituskie v. CorbmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Jones v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Jubelirer v. RendellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Wertz v. Chapman TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.