Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against Botimer

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2009No. 200,625-6PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

214 P.3d 133 (2009)

In the Matter of the DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING Against Larry A. BOTIMER, an Attorney at Law.

No. 200,625-6.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued May 21, 2009.

Decided August 20, 2009.

Paul Eugene Simmerly, Attorney at Law, Bellevue, WA, for Petitioner.

Randy Von Beitel, Washington State Bar Association, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

OWENS, J.

¶ 1 The Washington State Bar Association (WSBA) accused attorney Larry Botimer of violating several provisions of the Rules of Professional Conduct (RPCs) regarding his representation and legal services provided to Ruth Reinking (Ruth),…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Shoemaker v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Moreman v. ButcherWashington Supreme Court · 1995

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  2. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against FergusonWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Van CampWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Van CampWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against WickershamWashington Supreme Court · 2013

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API