Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Wickersham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 2013No. 201,088-1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

¶1 This is an attorney discipline matter involving events during a time when the petitioner, Joe Wickersham, was experiencing mental health issues. The hearing officer recommended disbarment. The disciplinary board (Board) rejected some misconduct findings and reduced the sanction to a three-year suspension. We adopt the Board’s recommendation and order Wickersham to complete a three-year suspension, and additional conditions, before resuming the practice of law.

PACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

f 2 Wickersham was admitted to practice in the state of Washington in 1989. At the time of the events…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Proceeding Against MarshallWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against AnschellWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against GuarneroWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against LongacreWashington Supreme Court · 2005

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Disciplinary Proceeding against AbeleWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Disciplinary Board v. BairdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Disciplinary Board v. PilchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Disciplinary Board v. PilchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Disciplinary Board v. PilchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API