Legal Opinion

In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Reid K.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 2015No. 7051 S-15328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

In August 2018 the superior court entered a 30-day involuntary civil commitment order for Reid K. 1 After holding a contested evi-dentiary hearing, the superior court found that Reid was likely to harm others and that no less restrictive alternative existed to prevent potential harm. ' Reid appeals that 30-day commitment. Shortly after Reid's 80-day commitment, Reid's doctors petitioned for a 90-day commitment. At the trial on the requested 90-day commitment, Reid stipulated that he was mentally ill and, as a result, was likely to cause harm to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. CoonAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Wetherhorn v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Bigley v. Alaska Psychiatric InstituteAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Kodiak Seafood Processors Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Akpik v. State, Office of Management & BudgetAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Hospitalization of Naomi B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In the Matter of the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Luciano G.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. In Re Hospitalization of Naomi B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API