Legal Opinion

State v. Marshall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1981No. 12PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Justice.

Defendant’s assignments of error numbers 1, 2, 3, 5 and 14 all relate to the sentencing phase of the trial. Since the jury at that phase returned a verdict favorable to defendant, the questions which he attempts to raise are moot and will not be decided. Jamison v. Kyles, 271 N.C. 722, 157 S.E. 2d 550 (1967). We will consider and pass upon only those assignments relating to the guilt determination phase of the trial.

Defendant has consolidated his assignments of error 5, 6, and 7 into one argument. He contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motions for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. FaustSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  2. State v. MyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. RogersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. State v. VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. State v. BuchananSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. PinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. ShankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. MylettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. MylettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. PinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API