N. C. Joint Stock Land Bank v. Cherry
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtDevin, J.
The findings of fact made by the court below were unchallenged by exception. From these it appears that the plaintiff Bank instituted suit in the Superior Court of Durham County and obtained judgment against the above named defendants, including the defendant Holden, for the balance due on an obligation under seal, which the defendant Holden had assumed and in writing promised to pay. Defendant Warren was not served. No answer was filed. Judgment was rendered by Judge E. H. Cranmer, presiding, at October Term, 1934, of Durham Superior Court.
However, as the result of an inadvertence, in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wilson v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Cook v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- State v. . TolaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Brooks v. . StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mason v. Moore County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. CagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Parker v. RobersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955