Legal Opinion

Cook v. . Moore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1888PublishedCited by 25 opinions

This was a motion to amend a judgment of the Court, inadvertently entered at October Term, 1886, (95th N. O., 1).

1Opinion of the CourtMebrimon, J.

The plaintiff moved at the present term to strike from the records of this Court an entry made by mistake, as suggested, that purports to be a judgment, in its nature final here in this case, granted at October Term of 1886, affirming the judgment of the Court below, and to enter of record nunc pro tuno the judgment reversing that judgment which the Court had determined upon, and intended to enter, but failed bjr inadvertence so to do.

It is not contended that this Court can reverse, set aside, or modify in any material respect, a regular, final judgment, at a term thereof subsequent to that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bronson v. SchultenSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  3. President of the Bank of the United States v. MossSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
  4. Matheson's Admin. v. Grant's Admin.Supreme Court of the United States · 1844
  5. Moore v. . HinnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Bernhardt v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. In Re PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Jenkins v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  4. City of Durham v. Eno Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Mann v. . MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API