Legal Opinion

Mason v. Moore County Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1948PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BaiíNiiill, J.

The defendants have not perfected the appeal the record shows they noted in the court below. Indeed, they are not the parties aggrieved. The cause is brought here by plaintiffs. But the record fails to disclose the jurisdictional facts necessary to vest us with authority to entertain the appeal.

That the entries of appeal are not those the parties intended to make would seem to be apparent. To guard against the possibility there may have been an error in transcribing the record, the Clerk of this Court communicated with the Clerk of the Superior Court of Moore County for the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Randleman Manufacturing Co. v. SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Sessions v. . Columbus CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Walton v. . McKessonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Corporation Com. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  5. Spence Ross v. . TapscottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. HamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Wolfe v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. State v. ChaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Hale v. Afro-American Arts International, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Aycock v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API