Legal Opinion
St. Louis Trading Co. v. Barr
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 1, 1934No. 21785PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
This action was commenced on November 18, 1928, in the district court of Washington county by Hattie Barr as plaintiff, against the St. Louis Trading Company, a partnership composed of Nathan Greenberg and Phillip Levine, and against such partners individually, as defendants.
The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for the alleged breach of an oral contract to employ her for a period of 22 months. Counsel for the plaintiff concede that the contract falls within the statute of frauds. They contend, however, that the defendants are estopped to assert the statute of frauds as a defense under the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. GandyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Burden v. SheridanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
- Tidal Oil Company v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Bearman v. BrackenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Sellers v. SellersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- Westerman v. City of CarlsbadNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1951
- Crosby v. Estate of StrahanWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
- Southard v. Oil Equipment CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Fowler v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.