DeMello v. DeMello
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside his default and judgment rendered thereon in a separate maintenance action. The motion was made upon the ground that said default was taken against said defendant through his mistake, inadvertence, surprise and excusable neglect.
On July 22, 1952, plaintiff filed a separate maintenance action against defendant and a copy of the summons and complaint, together with an order to show cause was served upon defendant on the following day. Apparently the hearing on the order to show cause was continued three times and then went…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brill v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Rehfuss v. RehfussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Wadsworth v. WadsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- McBlain v. McBlainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- William Wolff & Co. v. Canadian Pacific RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gore v. WittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Stafford v. MacHCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Van Dyke v. MacMillanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Hendrix v. HendrixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Berset v. BersetCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.