Legal Opinion

State v. Wilburn

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1982No. 8114SC1024PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

On 9 March 1981, one day prior to the trial, defendant’s attorney filed a motion for continuance until 11 May 1981. He also filed a notice informing the court that he represented defendant for the limited purpose of moving for the continuance. The court denied the motion and ordered defendant to proceed to trial. Defendant has assigned error to the court’s denial of this motion for continuance.

The record on appeal reveals that on 4 August 1980 defendant was indicted for attempting to obtain property by false pretenses. He was indicted on the conspiracy charge approximately three…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. CaudleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. Celebrezze v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Reid v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. HyattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. State v. FronebergerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. ArmsteadCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Florence v. HiattCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API