Nahrebeski v. Cincinnati Milacron Mktg. Co.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEVENS, Chief Judge.
This case is before the court on the motion of defendant for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion for summary judgment is denied.
I. Factual Summary
Briefly stated, the facts of this case are as follows:
Plaintiff was discharged from his position as a “field service engineer” in defendant’s plastics machinery division on November 14, 1990. Plaintiff was fifty-seven years old at the time, and, in his last work appraisal on October 30, 1990, plaintiffs supervisor wrote that plaintiff was “doing a good job.” Claiming that his age was a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Henry L. NAHREBESKI, Appellee, v. CINCINNATI MILACRON MARKETING COMPANY, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Denesha v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997
- Castellano, III v. BettsDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Levere, Jr. v. Signature Properties, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2022