Henry L. NAHREBESKI, Appellee, v. CINCINNATI MILACRON MARKETING COMPANY, Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Henry L. Nahrebeski brought this action against the Cincinnati Milacron Marketing Company under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. The District Court denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, 835 F.Supp. 1130 (W.D.Mo.1993) (Stevens, C.J.). The case was then tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in plaintiffs favor. From the judgment entered on that verdict, defendant has appealed.
The parties have now submitted a joint motion to dismiss the appeal, reciting that the case has been settled. The motion also asks us to direct…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Nahrebeski v. Cincinnati Milacron Mktg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1993
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marseilles Hydro Power LLC v. Marseilles Land & Water Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Denesha v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1997
- Pressley Ridge Schools v. ShimerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Milar Elevator Co. v. District of Columbia Department of Employment ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Marseilles Hydro Power Llc v. Marseilles Land & Water Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.