Legal Opinion
Furniture Brands International, Inc. v. United States International Trade Commission
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 15, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2011-0202PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Furniture Brands International, Inc. (“plaintiff’) has brought suit against Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”), the International Trade Commission (“ITC”), and, in their official capacities, Customs Commissioner Bersin and ITC Chairperson Okun (collectively “defendants”), to recover funds it believes it is owed under the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (“CDSOA”), 19 U.S.C. § 1675c, repealed by Pub.L. No. 109-171, § 7601, 120 Stat. 154 (Feb. 8, 2006). Before its repeal, the CDSOA directed Customs to redistribute money that…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Alltrade, Inc. v. Uniweld Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Pacesetter Systems, Inc. v. Medtronic, Inc. And Med Rel Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hulley Enterprises Ltd. v. Russian FederationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Furniture Brands International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Stone & Webster, Inc. v. Georgia Power CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Seneca Nation of Indians v. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Coal River Mountain Watch v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.