Legal Opinion

Ferebee v. . Thomason

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The questions involved: (1) Did the court err in preserving the status quo upon the facts set forth in this action and appear ing from tbe pleadings? (2) Did tbe court err in making tbe Home Mortgage Corporation and First and Merchants National Bank of Richmond, Ya., parties 'defendant, where it appeared upon the record that they claimed to be beneficiaries under the deed of trust sought to be foreclosed? We think both questions must be answered in the negative.

In Holder v. Mortgage Co., ante, 207 (208), speaking to the subject, we find: “Injunctions generally will continue, where it will not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wentz v. Piedmont Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. First National Bank of Durham v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Brinkley v. . NormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Brown v. AydlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Huskins v. Yancey HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Huskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Buncombe County v. . PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. County of Buncombe v. PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API