Legal Opinion
Brown v. Aydlett
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided February 23, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
It appearing tbat a serious controversy exists between tbe parties, and tbat no barm can result from continuing tbe restraining order to tbe bearing, while a contrary ruling might work serious injury to tbe plaintiffs, we are of opinion tbat under authority of Wentz v. Land Co., ante, 32, and cases there cited, tbe restraining order should have been continued to tbe final bearing.
Error.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Huskins v. Yancey HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Huskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Ferebee v. . ThomasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Holder v. Home Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Warren v. . BourneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928