Ashley v. Kramer
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Judge.
There are two major issues in relation to this appeal, one is a procedural problem and the other is claimed error in the judgment based upon the findings of fact. The appellants were the plaintiffs in the Superior Court.
THE PROCEDURAL PROBLEM
The present attorneys for the appellants were not the attorneys who represented them in the Superior Court. The present attorneys were substituted as the attorneys of record after the first appeal in relation to this matter was lodged with the Court of Appeals. During the pendency of the first appeal, the appellees made a motion to dismiss…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nielson v. FlashbergArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Lutfy v. R. D. Roper & Sons Motor Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Eaton Fruit Co. v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
- City of Tucson v. WondergemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Packard Phoenix Motor Co. v. McRuerArizona Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Harry Bechtel and Cathleen Bechtel, Husband and Wife v. Liberty National Bank, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Mecham v. United Bank of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Baumann v. TutonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JS-378Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
- Anderson v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2018
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.