Baumann v. Tuton
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WEISBERG, Presiding Judge.
In this case we consider whether the filing of a notice of appeal while a motion for new trial is pending in the trial court confers jurisdiction upon this Court and therefore has the effect of abandoning the pending motion. We hold that the notice of appeal was premature and, because this Court lacked appellate jurisdiction, appellee did not abandon his motion for new trial.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
James D. Tuton and Robert D. Amquist (“appellants”) formed a limited partnership to purchase a parcel of land for investment and offered units of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barassi v. MatisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Maganas v. NorthroupArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Riley v. County of CochiseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- City of Tucson v. WondergemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Bryan v. Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- Craig v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2011
- Baker v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Performance Funding, LLC v. Barcon Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.