Anderson v. Bass Pro Outdoor World, LLC
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
BETH PHILLIPS, JUDGE
Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint alleges that Defendant advertised a sale *834price on a fishing rod and reel combination ("the rod/reel combo") despite knowing that it had insufficient quantities to satisfy the anticipated demand, and that Defendant did not advise that quantities were limited or offer rainchecks or substitutions. Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and either a nationwide class or a series of subclasses, assert statutory and common law claims. Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss. (Doc. 52.) Defendant's Motion is GRANTED.1
I. BACKGROUND
The Second…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- Hess v. Chase Manhattan Bank, USA, N.A.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007
- Stodghill v. Wellston School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brown v. Adtalem Global Education, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2019
- Miller v. Emerson Electric Company,et alDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025
- Pinkney v. TBC CorporationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020
- Slaughter v. Bass Pro, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 2023