Hildenbrand v. City of Adair Village
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.
Petitioners seek judicial review of an opinion and order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (board) that remands city and county ordinances adopted to expand an urban growth boundary. Petitioners claim that the board erred in not requiring additional justification from the local governments for the urban growth boundary expansion. We conclude that the board’s order is unlawful in substance because it failed to require a justification by the local governments of the quantity of land added to the area within the boundary that is necessary under Goal 14.
Respondent JT Smith, Inc., applied to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- D. S. Parklane Development, Inc. v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Citizens Against Irresponsible Growth v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- City of West Linn v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. City of DundeeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
3Cited by1 opinion
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011