Keller v. City of Columbus, Ind.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ENTRY DISCUSSING SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT CITY OF COLUMBUS, INDIANA
TINDER, District Judge.
The essence of this matter is whether Plaintiffs are covered by the Fair Labor Standards Act (the “Act” or “FLSA”), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 201, et seq. (West 1965 & Supp. 1991). Under the Act, public fire fighting employees are entitled to premium compensation, at the rate of one and one-half times their regular rate, for time worked in excess of fifty-three hours per week. Id. at § 207(k); 29 C.F.R. § 553.201(a) (1990). Exempt from these wage and hour provisions is any “employee…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Corning Glass Works v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Janet Klein v. Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Quirk v. Baltimore County, Md.District Court, D. Maryland · 1995
- Kuchinskas v. Broward CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1993
- Pautlitz v. City of NapervilleDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1992
- Reeves v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.