Legal Opinion

Commissioner of Revenue v. Mullins

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 19, 1998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

This is an appeal by the Commissioner of Revenue (commissioner), pursuant to G. L. c. 58A, § 13, from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board (board), abating a controlled substances tax (CST) assessed against Robert Mullins (taxpayer) pursuant to G. L. c. 64K. Relying primarily on the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth Ranch, 511 U.S. 767 (1994) (Kurth Ranch), the board determined that the assessment constituted a “punishment” for purposes of the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Because the *407assessment…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Desimone v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. BaehlerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. BennettMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  5. Commonwealth v. BogannamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API