State v. Baehler
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
TERNUS, Justice.
The defendant, Robert Baehler, asks the court to reconsider its previous decision in State v. Lange, 531 N.W.2d 108 (Iowa 1995), holding that Iowa’s drug tax is not a criminal penalty so as to trigger the protection of the Double Jeopardy Clause. See generally Iowa Code ch. 453B (1997) (imposing an excise tax on dealers who acquire, purchase, possess, manufacture, or produce specified illegal substances in this state). Although we have reviewed decisions from other states rendered since our Lange opinion in which courts have held that a drug tax is punishment, we find no basis…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. ConstantineSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re the Detention of GarrenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- State v. LaRueSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Vick v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Vick v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Steven Waters v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Revenue for the State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2009