Legal Opinion

American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Muller

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided November 27, 1968No. Civ. A. No. 68-498PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

DONALD RUSSELL, District Judge.

This action involves the right of the grantee of an easement, upon abandonment of the easement, to remove from the servient premises equipment installed incident to the enjoyment of the easement. It arises out of a grant by deed to the plaintiff of an easement to erect and maintain telephone lines across the properties of the defendant’s predecessor in title. Plaintiff constructed such lines across the servient estate under the terms of the easement deed. It is now abandoning such line and seeks to remove the poles and transmission wires…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. City of Greenville v. Washington American League Baseball ClubSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  2. Curtiss v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1848
  3. Planter's Bank v. Lummus Cotton Gin Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  4. Hughes v. Edisto Cypress Shingle Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1897
  5. William Firth Co. v. South Carolina Loan & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wayne County v. Britton TrustMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Colonial Pipeline Co. v. State Department of Assessments and TaxationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. In Re South Atlantic Packers Ass'n, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 1983
  4. Navarro v. Lucas (In Re K & a Servicing, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1985
  5. In Re JosephUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API