Legal Opinion

Wayne County v. Britton Trust

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1997No. 104299, Calendar No. 8PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

In this appeal, we address two issues: (1) what constitutes a “fixture” for purposes of the condemnation process, and (2) whether a condemnee can force the condemning agency to pay either the value-in-place or the detach/reattachment costs for his fixtures. We reaffirm the three-part test enumerated in Morris v Alexander, 208 Mich 387; 175 NW 264 (1919), for determining what constitutes a fixture. Property is a fixture if (1) it is annexed to the realty, whether the annexation is actual or constructive; (2) its adaptation or application to the realty being used is appropriate; and (3) there…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Cardinal Mooney High School v. Michigan High School Athletic Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 1991
  2. City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. In Re Widening of Bagley AvenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State Highway Commission v. Superbilt Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. CusickMichigan Supreme Court · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Fane v. Detroit Library CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. FoxMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Silver Creek Drain District v. Extrusions Division, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. Herald Co. v. City of KalamazooMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Motors Liquidation Co. Avoidance Action Trust ex rel. Wilmington Trust Co. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In re Motors Liquidation Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API