Legal Opinion

Planter's Bank v. Lummus Cotton Gin Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 30, 1925No. 11814PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

Action for $5,000 damages, actual and punitive, on account of the alleged wrongful act of the defendant in removing and converting to its own use certain gin machinery, from a ginhouse and lot belonging to one J. P. Clinkscales. The plaintiff held a real estate mortgage upon the ginhouse and lot, executed before the machinery was installed on the lot. The defendant held a chattel mortgage upon the machinery executed-after it had been paid for and installed. The plaintiff contends that the machinery was installed in such a way as to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lavenson v. Standard Soap Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Wolff v. SampsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Madden & Co. v. Phoenix Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
  4. Carpenter v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Hughes v. Edisto Cypress Shingle Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. WilkesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. City of Greenville v. Washington American League Baseball ClubSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  3. Caulk v. CaulkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  4. Lesser v. Bridgeport-City Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  5. Mallory v. AgeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API