Legal Opinion

United States v. Schrenk

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 2, 1917No. 1738PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 39748.

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

The merchandise in this case, which is a sample or experimental importation, consists of glass sheets of two sizes, one 12 by 14 and the other 14 by 40 inches, each sheet consisting or made up of two *452plates of polished cylinder glass glued together. The sheets before being so glued were transparent, and apparently such is the condition of the merchandise before us. There is also a black rim or finish around the edges composed of an adhesive substance or material designed to, and which it is said does, prevent dampness getting between the two plates.

The collector classified the merchandise as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tide Water Oil Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. United States v. DudleySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Fenton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. RichterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  5. American Thermo-Ware Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Gibson-Thomsen Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  2. Bache & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  3. Nahrgang v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  4. Atlas Export Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  5. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API