Legal Opinion

Norris v. National Union Fire Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 17, 2006No. 1-05-3132PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE WOLFSON

delivered the opinion of the court:

This is the second time this case has come before the appellate court. The defendant National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, PA. (National Union), contends the uninsured motorist coverage limits rulings against it the first time were wrong and asks us to change them. National Union also contends the statutorily required arbitration based on the first decision is not binding on the parties and should not have been confirmed by the trial court. We adhere to the rulings in the first Norris decision and we affirm the trial…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. People v. PattersonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. YapejianIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Sulser v. Country Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. Robertson v. Travelers Insurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Long v. ElbornoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  2. Radwill v. Manor Care of Westmont, IL, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  3. Virgin Islands Taxi Ass'n v. Virgin Islands Port AuthoritySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  4. People ex rel. Madigan v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. Kreutzer v. Illinois Commerce Comm'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API