Fort Dearborn National Bank of Chicago v. Security Bank of Renville
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of tbe district court for Ren-ville county, Powers, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action to recover for money bad and received. Defendant bad judgment in tbe court below, and plaintiff appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
Tbe facts are as follows: On December 17, 1896, tbe firm of Tomlinson, Stafford and Co. issued tbeir check for tbe sum of $600, payable to one E. M. Holton. Holton indorsed tbe check in blank, and presented it to defendant bank, and received tbe amount thereof in money. Defendant forwarded the check to plaintiff, its correspondent in tbe city of Chicago, and plaintiff received tbe same in due course of mail, for collection and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Exchange Nat. Bank of Pittsburgh v. Third Nat. Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Streissguth v. National German-American BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Grosse v. CooleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Naser v. . First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Dickinson v. KinneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1861
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Loth v. LothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Hommerberg v. State Bank of SlaytonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Semingson v. Stock Yards National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Pope v. Ramsey County State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- National Non-Theatrical Motion Picture Bureau, Inc. v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.