Legal Opinion
Hommerberg v. State Bank of Slayton
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 21, 1927No. 25,571PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQiUINN, J.
Plaintiff is a farmer, residing 18 miles out from Slayton, in Murray county. Defendant is a banking corporation, organized under the laws of this state and engaged in the general banking business at Slayton. On July 17, 1924, plaintiff sold to Paul W. Giese a bunch of cattle, taking his check for $558.10 therefor, drawn on the First State Bank of Balaton, payable to himself, and on that day sent the same by mail to the defendant bank in which he had an account subject to check. The bank received the check, placed the amount thereof to the credit of plaintiff and, on the following day, July…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exchange Nat. Bank of Pittsburgh v. Third Nat. Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Allen v. Merchant's BankCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Ayrault v. . the Pacific BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Bank of Antigo v. Union Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Clark v. ClarkNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
- Holdingford Milling Co. v. Hillman Farmers Co-Operative CreamerySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Transcontinental Oil Co. v. Federal Reserve BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Tobiason v. First State Bank of AshbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Bay State Milling Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.