Legal Opinion

Hooper-Bond Ltd. Partnership Fund III v. Ragar

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 25, 1988No. 87-192PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

The present case is the third appeal before this court involving a successful derivative suit by Don Ragar and Hooper-Bond Limited Partnership Fund III (Limited Partnership Fund III) against Joseph Hooper, Boyd Bond and the Hooper-Bond Partnership for alleged improper acts relating to the Limited Partnership. In the current case, the appellant, Limited Partnership Fund III, is appealing the circuit court’s decision to award Don Ragar $20,000 for Christine Ragar’s services in preparation for the derivative suit.1 Appellant raises two points on appeal: 1) Whether the trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Polnac-Hartman & Associates v. First National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  2. McDermott v. StraussSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  3. Puckett v. PuckettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Shelter Insurance Co. v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barr v. Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  2. Gosnell v. Independent Service Finance, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Mitchell v. GoodallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1988
  4. Ragar v. HooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Freeman v. City of DeWittSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API