D.D. v. L.A.H.

*758OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

D.D. (Daniell)1 and LAH. (Leif) filed opposing motions to modify custody of their son, TH. (Travis). Without holding a hearing or making findings the superior court granted Leif's motion and denied Danielle's. We reverse and remand because an evidentiary hearing and findings are required in opposed custody modification proceedings. Further, we hold that the record does not support failing to grant visitation to Danielle during the nine months of the year that Leif has custody.

IL FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Danielle and Leif were granted a decree of dissolution…