Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Pearson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2000No. S-8973PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

0 P I N I 0 N

2Per curiam

I, INTRODUCTION -

When Mark and Sara Pearson were divoreed, they agreed that Sara would have legal and primary physical custody of their two children. Nine months later, Sara moved from Soldotna to Pennsylvania, and Mark sought modification of the custody arrangement. Although Mark alleged that Sara's decision to move was prompted by her wish to deprive Mark of contact with the children, the trial court found no such motivation and ordered that Sara retain legal and physical custody of the children. Because the trial court did not err in its determination that it was in the best…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. S.N.E. v. R.L.B.Alaska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. House v. HouseAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Horutz v. HorutzAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
  4. McQuade v. McQuadeAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Craig v. McBrideAlaska Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by15 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. J.L.P. v. V.L.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Meier v. CloudAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bagby v. BagbyAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Maxwell v. MaxwellAlaska Supreme Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API