Legal Opinion

Luther v. Bureau of Employment Services

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 9, 1984No. (83AP-317PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.

Appellant, Doris J. Luther, advances the following assignment of error:

“The trial court’s decision and entry granting appellee’s motion for relief from judgment is contrary to the specific mandatory requirements of Section 119.12 of the Ohio Revised Code which must be strictly construed.”

Appellant’s assignment of error is well-taken. Appellant was a fulltime Certified Employment Contract Specialist in the office of Special Programs within the Ohio Bureau of Employment Services. She received a letter from the administrator stating that “[w]e regret to inform you that a reduction in staff is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Crockett v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Lorms v. State, Dept. of Commerce, Div. of Real EstateOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Checker Realty Co. v. Ohio Real Estate CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Genoa Banking Co. v. MillsOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Brockmeyer v. Ohio Real Estate Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Geroc v. Ohio Veterinary Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Black v. Ohio State Board of PsychologyOhio Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Ray v. Ohio Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Kramp v. Ohio State Racing CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API