Legal Opinion
Lorms v. State, Dept. of Commerce, Div. of Real Estate
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 8, 1976No. 76-417PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWillam B. Brown, J.
The main issue raised in this cause is whether the nonprejudicial omission of two letters from the certified record of an appealed administrative hearing mandates a finding in favor of the appellant pursuant to R. C. 119.12.
R. C. 119.12 provides, in pertinent part:
“Within twenty days after receipt of notice of appeal from an order in any case wherein a hearing is required by Sections 119.01 to 119.13, inclusive, of the Revised Code, the agency shall prepare and certify to the court a complete record of the proceedings in the case. Failure of the agency to comply within the time allowed shall,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McKenzie v. Ohio State Racing CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Young v. Bd. of ReviewOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by28 opinions
- Lies v. Ohio Veterinary Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
- Arlow v. Ohio Rehabilitation Services CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- McGee v. Ohio State Board of PsychologyOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Geroc v. Ohio Veterinary Medical BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Gwinn v. Ohio Elections CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.