Legal Opinion
Ray v. Ohio Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 19, 1993No. 1858PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Grey, Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Ross County. The court affirmed a finding of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review denying benefits to Joseph H. Ray II. We reverse and remand.
Ray worked for WearEver/Proetor-Silex for approximately twenty-three years. On October 20,1988, he was released. Following his release, he filed a grievance through the union and pursued other legal remedies challenging the discharge. The company failed to meet for arbitration on three occasions and, after the third occasion, Ray learned that the union would be disbanded…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State ex rel. Crockett v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Hall v. American Brake Shoe Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
- Arlow v. Ohio Rehabilitation Services CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Dvorak v. Municipal Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Franklin Township v. Village of Marble CliffOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McCann v. City of LakewoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Lake v. State Med. Bd. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- Ohio Div. of Real Estate & Professional LicensingOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State Employment Relations Board v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1995