Legal Opinion

McMullin v. Union Land & Management Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 8, 1991No. Record 910013PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whiting

In this case, we decide whether an arbitration provision in a partnership agreement is sufficiently broad to require arbitration of a partner’s claim against the partnership for services rendered to the partnership.

On January 29, 1973, James H. McMullin, Union Land & Management Company (Union), and Said Haddad, as general and limited partners, entered into a partnership agreement to acquire, own, and operate real property in an area in Arlington surrounded by North Randolph, Ninth, Tenth, and North Stafford Streets (the block). Union’s and Haddad’s interests in the partnership were acquired…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Sindler v. BatlemanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. International Talent Group, Inc. v. Copyright Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
  5. Holloway v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Ulloa v. Qsp, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
  2. Waterfront Marine Construction, Inc. v. North End 49ers Sandbridge Bulkhead Groups A, B and CSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  3. Trustees of Asbury United Methodist Church v. Taylor & Parrish, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1995
  4. In re A2P SMS Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  5. Weitz v. HudsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API