Legal Opinion
Weitz v. Hudson
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided June 8, 2001No. Record 002073PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kinser
Pursuant to Code § 8.01-581.016, this case is an interlocutory appeal from an order denying an application to compel arbitration. Because we conclude that the specific controversy alleged in a motion for judgment is covered by an arbitration clause in a limited partnership agreement, we will reverse the judgment of the circuit court.
FACTS AND MATERIAL PROCEEDINGS
The appellee, Donald E. Hudson, and the appellant, Benjamin B. Weitz, were general partners in a limited partnership formed under the laws of the State of Maryland and known as Leesburg Manor Associates Limited Partnership (Leesburg…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Waterfront Marine Construction, Inc. v. North End 49ers Sandbridge Bulkhead Groups A, B and CSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
- Doyle and Russell, Inc. v. Roanoke Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Virginia · 1973
- McMullin v. Union Land & Management Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- International Talent Group, Inc. v. Copyright Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
3Cited by9 opinions
- Phillips v. MazyckSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
- Bramow v. Toll VA, L.P.Loudoun County Circuit Court · 2005
- Brush Arbor Home Construction v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Virginia · 2019
- Decisive Analytics Corp. v. ChikarFairfax County Circuit Court · 2008
- Suntrust Securities, Inc. v. MarableCharlottesville County Circuit Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.