Legal Opinion
Holloway v. Smith
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided September 14, 1955No. Record 4390PublishedCited by 8 opinions
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtSpratley, J.
This is a motion by Susan G. Holloway against Milton G. Smith, Maude B. Smith and Warren W. Ten Brook, partners trading and doing business as Greenwood Sales & Service, to recover judgment on a certain negotiable note, dated August 24, 1951, and signed “Greenwood Sales Service by Warren W. Ten Brook, Partner,” payable to the order of Susan G. Holloway.
Milton G. Smith and Maude B. Smith filed grounds of defense, denying that they were partners at the time of the execution of the said note; or that the signature thereon was a genuine signature of any partnership of which they were or had been…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Whichard v. NeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
- Esso Standard Oil Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- Sutton v. SuttonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952
- Malbon v. DavisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- Commercial Bank v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- South Side Lumber Co. v. Stone Construction Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1967
- McMullin v. Union Land & Management Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Gary Green v. Maurice P. Foley, Gary Green v. Maurice P. FoleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- City of Virginia Beach v. RomanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1960
- Kumar v. Metropolitan Hospital, L.P.Richmond County Circuit Court · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.