Legal Opinion

Brister v. Barton and Rich Drilling Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 17, 1956No. 37166PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALLEY, Justice.

On June 15, 1955, O. M. Brister, hereinafter called claimant, filed his first notice of injury and claim for compensation stating that on June 3, 1955, he sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with Barton and Rich Drilling Company. On the 22nd day of November, 1955, the trial commissioner denied an award. This proceeding is brought by claimant against the employer and its insurance carrier, hereinafter called respondents, to review the order denying an award.

The order denying the award in part is as follows:

“That claimant voluntarily…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Town of Granite v. KidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Nelson Electric Manufacturing Co. v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Terry Motor Company v. MixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  2. Geeslin v. Workmen's Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Thomas v. SundownerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API