Legal Opinion

Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Jordan

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 10, 1929No. 20475PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.

The State Industrial Commission found that on January 28, 1929, the claimant, Doyle Jordan, was in the'employment of the Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company and engaged in a hazardous occupation; that on said day a fight occurred between claimant, Jordan, and. another employee of the respondent company and said fight arose over a wrench, for which wrench claimant had been sekt by his foreman; that the fellow employ ee referred to was the aggressor in said fight; that prior to said fight an ill feeling existed between the participants arising out of matters not connected with claimant's…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Claim of Verschleiser v. Joseph Stern & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Stasmos v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Oklahoma-Arkansas Tel. Co. v. FriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Martin v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Superior Smokeless Coal & Mining Co. v. HiseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Stanolind Pipe Line Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Town of Granite v. KidwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  3. Nelson Electric Manufacturing Co. v. CartwrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. FarmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Terry Motor Company v. MixonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API